Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	13.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2 1,265 User benchmarks, average bench 64% SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	71.4% Very good	Memory 83.3 1-Core 81.8 2-Core 160 64% 108 Pts	4-Core 322 8-Core 523 52% 422 Pts	64-Core 1,211 75% 1,211 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000 11,114 User benchmarks, average bench 13% Nvidia(10DE 097C) 3GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 391.33 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	13.5% Very poor	Lighting 15.5 Reflection 14.2 Parallax 19 13% 16.2 fps	MRender 21 Gravity 18.5 Splatting 17.4 15% 19 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD3000HLHX-01JJPV0 300GB 3,057 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 49GB free (System drive) Firmware: 04.05G04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 56 74 75 81 80 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	51.3% Above average	Read 105 Write 109 Mixed 83.2 SusWrite 72.8 69% 92.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.2 233% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 79%
Seagate Constellation ES.3 2TB-$58 5,099 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 1.5TB free Firmware: SN04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 155 153 153 156 155 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	90.4% Outstanding	Read 160 Write 160 Mixed 83.5 SusWrite 154 102% 139 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.2 236% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 90.4% Great: 104%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB 18,883 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 4GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 4.9 4.9 4.5 4.9 4.8 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	4.17% Terrible	Read 15.3 Write 2.5 Mixed 5.3 SusWrite 4.5 7% 6.9 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 15% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.17% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B5173QH0-CMA 4x4GB 283 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	44.9% Average	MC Read 22.6 MC Write 12.4 MC Mixed 14.8 47% 16.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.5 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 5.7 21% 7.27 GB/s	Latency 74.7 54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 99%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v21stBench 58%, 1,402 samples	66x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2637 v21stBench 73%, 400 samples	48x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v21stBench 64%, 1,386 samples	47x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	79x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	38x
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples	26x

RAM
HMT451R7AFR8C-RD 4x4GBHynixBench 82%, 1,002 samples	36x
9JSF51272PZ-1G9E2 4x4GBMicronBench 82%, 908 samples	28x
18JSF1G72PZ-1G9E1 4x8GBMicronBench 77%, 512 samples	28x

Value: 25% - Poor

Total price: $94

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16