Lenovo 7515M9G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	4.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (92%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Lenovo 7515M9G (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO To be filled by O.E.M.
Memory	1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100715
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Feb 21 '20 at 21:52
Run Duration	185 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	92%

PC Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium E5400-$75 14,795 User benchmarks, average bench 36% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	24.3% Poor	Memory 38.7 1-Core 22.5 2-Core 49.2 24% 36.8 Pts	4-Core 58.5 8-Core 64.8 8% 61.7 Pts	64-Core 49.1 3% 49.1 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670 32,193 User benchmarks, average bench 6% PwrHis(1787 2309) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	4.4% Terrible	Lighting 5.63 Reflection 5.42 Parallax 6.03 5% 5.7 fps	MRender 4.24 Gravity 5.7 Splatting 4.83 4% 4.92 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.4% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD1600HLFS-60G6U2 160GB 3,337 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: 04.04V03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 34 36 41 39 34 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	32.1% Below average	Read 75.4 Write 78.5 Mixed 53.4 SusWrite 35.9 45% 60.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 167% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 68%
WD WD5000AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB 13,629 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 10GB free Firmware: 01.01B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 35 38 41 39 34 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	22.1% Poor	Read 40.2 Write 39 Mixed 28.5 SusWrite 36.3 27% 36 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 111% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 44%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$23 53,598 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 49GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 48 55 56 52 48 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	45.4% Average	Read 106 Write 93.3 Mixed 51.7 SusWrite 51.9 56% 75.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 87%
Hitachi HUA721010KLA330 1TB-$28 10,651 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 28GB free Firmware: GKAOAB0A SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 48 55 55 52 48 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	30% Poor	Read 52.6 Write 58.1 Mixed 33.1 SusWrite 51.5 36% 48.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM SDRAM Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	10.5% Very poor	MC Read 4 MC Write 3.3 MC Mixed 3.5 10% 3.6 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 1.9 SC Mixed 2.1 6% 2.1 GB/s	Latency 209 19% 209 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.5% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Lenovo 7515M9G

Performance Results

PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)