HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1495
Memory	9.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111110
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Feb 22 '20 at 11:05
Run Duration	207 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	71.2% Very good	Memory 91 1-Core 84.4 2-Core 168 68% 114 Pts	4-Core 292 8-Core 334 41% 313 Pts	64-Core 334 21% 334 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz) 150,891 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 1495) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.04% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 1.42 Parallax 1 1% 1.17 fps	MRender 1.86 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 2 1% 1.55 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.04% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HDS721050CLA660 500GB 17,638 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 391GB free (System drive) Firmware: JP2OA41A SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 87 94 97 111 102 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	55.8% Above average	Read 103 Write 89.4 Mixed 52.6 SusWrite 91.7 62% 84.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.2 66% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 76%
Seagate ST3250820AS 250GB-$50 16,391 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 233GB free Firmware: 3.AAE SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 65 65 65 65 65 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	37.5% Below average	Read 65.3 Write 34 Mixed 39.8 SusWrite 65.1 38% 51.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 44%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 8GB 2,387 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 1GB free, PID c75c Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 5.8 5.1 3.3 5 6 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	4.15% Terrible	Read 14.9 Write 2.7 Mixed 2.7 SusWrite 4.9 7% 6.3 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.15% Great: 7%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 8GB 2,387 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 2GB free, PID c75c Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Mixed 2.2 4% 2.2 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 15% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 7%
WDC WD32 00AAJS-00L7A0 320GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 252GB free, PID 2352 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 17 21 16 14 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	13.6% Very poor	Read 31.1 Write 20.6 Mixed 10.7 SusWrite 18.4 25% 20.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 19%
HDS72202 0ALA330 RSD HUA 2TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 1.5TB free, PID 2352 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 2.6 2.2 2.7 2 2.4 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	9.24% Terrible	Read 31.4 Write 21.2 Mixed 23.8 SusWrite 2.4 24% 19.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.24% Great: 12%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 Elpida EBJ20UF8BCF0-DJ-F CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 Elpida EBJ20UF8BCF0-DJ-F 12GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	50.2% Above average	MC Read 16.8 MC Write 18.3 MC Mixed 16.3 49% 17.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 15.5 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 65.8 61% 65.8 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 3,259 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	1,668x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	553x
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	545x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,776x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	275x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	238x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	123x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	54x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	49x

RAM
9905584-014.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 51%, 436 samples	38x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	37x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 27%, 3,798 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16