Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	95.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$75 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	75.5% Very good	Memory 83.1 1-Core 109 2-Core 221 78% 138 Pts	4-Core 366 8-Core 587 58% 476 Pts	64-Core 588 36% 588 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 600 15,964 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 0835) 1GB CLim: 640 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.83 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.23% Terrible	Lighting 4 Reflection 4.5 Parallax 3.53 3% 4.01 fps	MRender 5.43 Gravity 3.93 Splatting 2.83 3% 4.06 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.23% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 196GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 356 360 360 359 360 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	95.8% Outstanding	Read 396 Write 359 Mixed 287 SusWrite 358 79% 350 MB/s	4K Read 27.6 4K Write 91.7 4K Mixed 36.3 137% 51.9 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 343 DQ Mixed 261 224% 329 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 95.8% Great: 128%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GU6AFR8C-PB Samsung M391B5273DH0-CK0 HMT41GU6AFR8C-PB HMT351U7EFR8C-PB 24GB 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	57.9% Above average	MC Read 22.2 MC Write 21.5 MC Mixed 16.3 57% 20 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 20.4 SC Mixed 21 53% 18.6 GB/s	Latency 75 53% 75 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16