Asrock H270M-ITX/ac

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	54.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H270M-ITX/ac (all builds)
Memory	11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170329
Uptime	6.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 21 '20 at 03:43
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	14%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7600K-$190 195,006 User benchmarks, average bench 76% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	82.3% Excellent	Memory 94 1-Core 126 2-Core 250 88% 156 Pts	4-Core 420 8-Core 357 53% 388 Pts	64-Core 412 26% 412 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 371A) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.12 Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	54.1% Above average	Lighting 66.4 Reflection 71 Parallax 61.9 54% 66.4 fps	MRender 66.9 Gravity 64.9 Splatting 66.5 54% 66.1 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 60%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SABRENT 1TB 317GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFM12.2 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	Read 1,381 Write 2,256 Mixed 1,539 1,294% 1,725 MB/s	4K Read 40.2 4K Write 137 4K Mixed 60.5 10,934% 79.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1,490 DQ Write 977 DQ Mixed 579 7,250% 1,016 MB/s

Asmt ASMT105 2TB 63 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 211 Write 176 Mixed 90.5 117% 159 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GX-D4-3200-MR 2x8GB 3,635 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	57.6% Above average	MC Read 23.2 MC Write 19.2 MC Mixed 16 56% 19.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 20.8 SC Mixed 19.2 52% 18.3 GB/s	Latency 59.9 67% 59.9 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H270M-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 170 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H270M-ITX/ac

CPU
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	27x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	25x
Core i5-7600KIntel $190Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	22x

GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	21x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	19x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	12x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	4x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	4x
MX300 SATA M.2 275GBCrucial $42Bench 80%, 16,792 samples	4x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $40Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	10x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	8x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 76%, 105,447 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $238

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16