Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 71% Battleship	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 73% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	71.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	32.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191113
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 23 '20 at 11:34
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	96.1% Outstanding	Memory 77.9 1-Core 157 2-Core 313 97% 183 Pts	4-Core 612 8-Core 1085 102% 848 Pts	64-Core 1,561 97% 1,561 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 96.1% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Nvidia(10DE 13C0) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1566 MHz, MLim: 1981 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.74 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	71.3% Very good	Lighting 90.8 Reflection 93.2 Parallax 83 74% 89 fps	MRender 90 Gravity 82.3 Splatting 73.4 66% 81.9 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 139GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF4500RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 104 110 97 101 98 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	32.7% Below average	Read 456 Write 368 Mixed 329 SusWrite 130 72% 321 MB/s	4K Read 14.7 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 1.1 24% 5.57 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 56%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 104GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 7,168 Write 6398 Mixed 6504 1,492% 6,690 MB/s	4K Read 461 4K Write 240 4K Mixed 296 1,205% 332 MB/s	DQ Read 1,409 DQ Write 949 DQ Mixed 1,053 820% 1,137 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 727GB free Firmware: 04.01A04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 110 111 113 112 111 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	71.7% Very good	Read 139 Write 122 Mixed 74.3 SusWrite 111 82% 112 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 194% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata 2x8GB 24,552 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	75.1% Very good	MC Read 30 MC Write 20.2 MC Mixed 29.5 76% 26.6 GB/s	SC Read 23.7 SC Write 20.1 SC Mixed 29.7 70% 24.5 GB/s	Latency 84.5 47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 98%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,434 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	395x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	133x
Ryzen 7 2700AMD $185Bench 74%, 123,820 samples	129x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	105x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	87x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	74x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	45x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	41x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	41x

RAM
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	51x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	50x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $578

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16