Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS V FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120601
Uptime11.6 Days
Run DateMar 26 '20 at 22:41
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
67.2% Good
Memory 89.9
1-Core 95.9
2-Core 170
71% 119 Pts
4-Core 241
8-Core 426
40% 333 Pts
64-Core 429
27% 429 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
Asus(1043 841A) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 442.59
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.2% Poor
Lighting 31.5
Reflection 29.8
Parallax 39.3
26% 33.5 fps
MRender 44.2
Gravity 38.5
Splatting 30.9
30% 37.9 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 282 126 100 87 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 430
Write 411
Mixed 318
SusWrite 175
75% 333 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 62.9
4K Mixed 42.9
133% 45 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 346
264% 357 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 134%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
718GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 73 73 74 73 73 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 72
Write 74
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 71.1
50% 67.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 51%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
852GB free
Firmware: CC4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 173 171 180 171 177 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Read 147
Write 99.5
Mixed 78.5
SusWrite 174
91% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
141% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 994069 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
53.4% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 17.1
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 15.4
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 67.3
59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS V FORMULA Builds (Compare 710 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA - $349

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $722
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback