Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FL_X509FL

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.53% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	33.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FL_X509FL (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X509FL
Memory	16 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190430
Uptime	3.5 Days
Run Date	Apr 02 '20 at 07:16
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	COL-User
Background CPU	20%
CPU Throttled	90%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8565U 81,207 User benchmarks, average bench 55% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	68.1% Good	Memory 75.2 1-Core 94 2-Core 176 66% 115 Pts	4-Core 330 8-Core 486 51% 408 Pts	64-Core 482 30% 482 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 11BF) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7372 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	6.53% Terrible	Lighting 6.43 Reflection 14.3 Parallax 6.22 5% 9 fps	MRender 8.9 Gravity 7.13 Splatting 15.3 9% 10.4 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.53% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS480G2G0B-00EPW0 480GB 14,337 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 388GB free (System drive) Firmware: UK500000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 2.9 4.6 36 4.5 184 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	33.9% Below average	Read 371 Write 328 Mixed 282 SusWrite 59.5 58% 260 MB/s	4K Read 7.7 4K Write 25.3 4K Mixed 8.9 36% 14 MB/s	DQ Read 107 DQ Write 88 DQ Mixed 45 48% 80 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 59%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 881GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 130 130 129 129 130 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	71.1% Very good	Read 118 Write 113 Mixed 67.1 SusWrite 130 78% 107 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 198% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 Kingston 20GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2400, 2667 MHz 4096, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	51.4% Above average	MC Read 19.6 MC Write 17.4 MC Mixed 16.2 51% 17.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 19.6 SC Mixed 17.5 49% 17 GB/s	Latency 89.9 44% 89.9 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FL_X509FL Builds (Compare 68 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FL_X509FL

CPU
Core i5-8265UIntelBench 53%, 87,841 samples	33x
Core i7-8565UIntelBench 55%, 81,207 samples	32x
Core i3-8145UIntelBench 53%, 15,431 samples	3x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	46x
GeForce MX250NvidiaBench 14%, 8,806 samples	22x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	15x
WDC PC SN520 SDA 256GBNvmeBench 148%, 3,002 samples	9x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	2x

RAM
4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GBMicronBench 57%, 2,923 samples	29x
4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GBMicronBench 56%, 1,078 samples	10x
4ATS1G64HZ-2G3E1 1x8GBMicronBench 40%, 486 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16