Asrock X99X Killer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.38% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive56.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X99X Killer  (all builds)
Memory22.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160701
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateApr 09 '20 at 00:18
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 80.8
1-Core 87
2-Core 175
66% 114 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 585
55% 457 Pts
64-Core 875
54% 875 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 5000
HP(103C 0770) 2.2GB
CLim: 513 MHz, MLim: 750 MHz, Ram: 2.2GB, Driver: 372.95
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
9.38% Terrible
Lighting 10.4
Reflection 15.7
Parallax 11.4
8% 12.5 fps
MRender 18
Gravity 8.07
Splatting 14.9
11% 13.6 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.38%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH 128GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK10D7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 75 64 53 49 71 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 438
Write 273
Mixed 313
SusWrite 78.7
61% 276 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 66.7
4K Mixed 17.3
101% 37.6 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 12.9
DQ Mixed 34.1
43% 83.3 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 78%
Toshiba MG03ACA400 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: FL2H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 160 161 159 160 160 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
78% Very good
Read 116
Write 112
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 155
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 78%
Great: 96%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
14GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 5.6 5.6 5.5 5.5 5.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
5.5% Terrible
Read 20.7
Write 5.2
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 5.5
11% 9.98 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
20% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.5%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.9% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 10.4
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 11.2
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99X Killer Builds (Compare 261 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99X Killer - $350

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $923
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback