Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	42.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	193% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	17.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190729
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Apr 09 '20 at 21:50
Run Duration	271 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	67.5% Good	Memory 67.4 1-Core 93.8 2-Core 189 65% 117 Pts	4-Core 363 8-Core 590 58% 476 Pts	64-Core 1,031 64% 1,031 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85EA) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 445.75 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.4% Average	Lighting 47.9 Reflection 55.3 Parallax 45 39% 49.4 fps	MRender 68.7 Gravity 48.2 Splatting 62.6 49% 59.8 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46 87,206 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 157GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 570 323 327 324 321 321 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	193% Outstanding	Read 2,400 Write 2,169 Mixed 1419 SusWrite 364 354% 1,588 MB/s	4K Read 39.8 4K Write 69.8 4K Mixed 48.5 159% 52.7 MB/s	DQ Read 618 DQ Write 501 DQ Mixed 578 428% 566 MB/s
Poor: 152% ↑ This bench: 193% Great: 302%
Kingston SUV300S37A240G 240GB 5,323 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 116GB free Firmware: SAFM12.G SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 135 156 156 150 152 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	79.1% Very good	Read 476 Write 442 Mixed 333 SusWrite 195 81% 361 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 56.8 4K Mixed 30.6 107% 37.4 MB/s	DQ Read 322 DQ Write 358 DQ Mixed 189 184% 290 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 92%
Crucial BX500 960GB-$54 11,103 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 82GB free Firmware: M6CR022 SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 6.3 6.4 6.2 6.7 5.4 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	69.2% Good	Read 497 Write 440 Mixed 408 SusWrite 39.3 77% 346 MB/s	4K Read 27.6 4K Write 73.7 4K Mixed 26.4 115% 42.6 MB/s	DQ Read 217 DQ Write 341 DQ Mixed 38.4 97% 199 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 91%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47 218,164 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 898GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 107 109 109 109 108 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	61.9% Good	Read 108 Write 108 Mixed 55.2 SusWrite 108 69% 94.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 62%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB 47,588 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 115GB free Firmware: 2BA30001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 82 83 83 81 83 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	49.2% Average	Read 89.7 Write 59 Mixed 53.7 SusWrite 81.6 52% 71 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 59%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB 47,588 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 17GB free Firmware: 2AR10002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 48 47 47 47 46 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	28.1% Poor	Read 50.7 Write 34.7 Mixed 34.3 SusWrite 46.8 31% 41.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 59%
Seagate Expansion 2TB 49,966 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1TB free Firmware: 9300 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 126 119 125 126 126 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	64.9% Good	Read 102 Write 128 Mixed 89.8 SusWrite 124 82% 111 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.2 100% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMR16GX4M2D3000C16 4x8GB 581 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	68.4% Good	MC Read 27.2 MC Write 22.5 MC Mixed 24.4 71% 24.7 GB/s	SC Read 17.4 SC Write 23.9 SC Mixed 21.5 60% 20.9 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 938 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 81%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 79%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	129x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	115x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	96x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	94x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	68x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	59x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	37x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	32x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	29x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	57x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	36x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $745

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16