Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics13.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive57.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 12 '20 at 18:50
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
44.8% Average
Memory 35.4
1-Core 105
2-Core 209
59% 116 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 291
41% 303 Pts
64-Core 256
16% 256 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 876B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.3.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Lighting 16.4
Reflection 16.2
Parallax 20
13% 17.5 fps
MRender 9.24
Gravity 16.4
Splatting 20.8
13% 15.5 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 136 99 99 102 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 382
Write 291
Mixed 270
SusWrite 140
60% 271 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 43
4K Mixed 19.1
79% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 162
137% 198 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 91%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
85GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 78.5
Write 74.2
Mixed 49.5
50% 67.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 51%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58
925GB free
Firmware: AX101U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 103 103 103 100 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
58% Above average
Read 100
Write 96.9
Mixed 31.9
SusWrite 102
60% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 58%
Great: 62%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 16GB
15GB free, PID 0749
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 5.4 8.9 8.4 8.9 7.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 34.3
Write 13.2
Mixed 10
SusWrite 8
18% 16.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.7
112% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2666 C16 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
54.4% Above average
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 23.6
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 12.4
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 225
18% 225 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 5,383 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $480
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback