Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium N4200 10,928 User benchmarks, average bench 30% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	35.5% Below average	Memory 46 1-Core 50.3 2-Core 96 38% 64.1 Pts	4-Core 148 8-Core 133 19% 140 Pts	64-Core 121 8% 121 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 505 2,850 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7263 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	3.22% Terrible	Lighting 3.73 Reflection 2.65 Parallax 2.06 3% 2.82 fps	MRender 2.62 Gravity 3.57 Splatting 6.09 4% 4.09 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 3.22% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
NT-128 128GB 1,116 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: T161118b SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 93 80 77 52 59 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	35% Below average	Read 326 Write 137 Mixed 162 SusWrite 75.6 39% 175 MB/s	4K Read 8.9 4K Write 24.3 4K Mixed 11.5 41% 14.9 MB/s	DQ Read 83.3 DQ Write 123 DQ Mixed 60.5 58% 89.1 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	28.4% Poor	MC Read 10 MC Write 12 MC Mixed 11.1 32% 11 GB/s	SC Read 3.4 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 3.9 11% 3.97 GB/s	Latency 176 23% 176 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 28%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3450IntelBench 27%, 6,637 samples	3x
Pentium N4200IntelBench 30%, 10,928 samples	3x

GPU
HD Graphics 505IntelBench 2%, 2,850 samples	3x
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	3x

SSD
NT-128 128GBBench 60%, 1,116 samples	4x
128GB SSD 128GBForeseeBench 59%, 2,750 samples	2x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	3x
Se HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 27%, 8 samples	2x
KingSpec 2x4GBUndeBench 26%, 1 sample	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16