Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire 9300

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 2.5GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire 9300  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Myallm
Memory1.7 GB free of 2.5 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20061213
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 17 '20 at 07:04
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Turion 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-50
U1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Memory 62.4
1-Core 23.9
2-Core 46.6
32% 44.3 Pts
4-Core 46.8
8-Core 46.8
6% 46.8 Pts
64-Core 46.3
3% 46.3 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST9120822AS 120GB-$35
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 31 31 30 26 29 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Read 30.4
Write 32.3
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 29.5
21% 28.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
100% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 24%
Adata DashDrive UV128 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
8GB free, PID db8a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 8.8 8.6 8.8 8.8 8.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
7.07% Terrible
Read 29.2
Write 8.7
Mixed 16.7
SusWrite 8.7
18% 15.8 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 1
49% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.07%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2GB
null MHz
512, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
MC Read 3.4
MC Write 3.7
MC Mixed 3.6
10% 3.57 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 3.1
10% 3.43 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 9300 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Acer Aspire 9300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback