Asus H61M-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	27.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus H61M-PRO (all builds)
Memory	14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141125
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 31 '17 at 16:52
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	79.8% Very good	Memory 91.8 1-Core 108 2-Core 209 79% 136 Pts	4-Core 369 8-Core 518 56% 443 Pts	64-Core 520 32% 520 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140 47,409 User benchmarks, average bench 24% Asus(1043 048D) CLim: 975 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	27.4% Poor	Lighting 34.3 Reflection 31 Parallax 41.3 28% 35.5 fps	MRender 28 Gravity 29 Splatting 36.8 26% 31.3 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 26%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100 46,066 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: 521ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 8425419 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 -131460358990568 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1708 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 211 (B1) Unknown 0 0 2 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 28 51 73017786396 (C2) HDA temperature 28 51 73017786396 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 8425419 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 8425419 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 8425419 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 7681 (EA) Unknown 0 0 5456 (F1) Unknown 0 0 5456 (F2) Unknown 0 0 7256	42.3% Average	Read 267 Write 170 Mixed 199 47% 212 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 38.5 4K Mixed 11.6 66% 23.5 MB/s	DQ Read 25 DQ Write 57.8 DQ Mixed 10.7 17% 31.2 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 87%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 659GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 172 172 4366 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 823 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1104 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 432 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 20 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 195 195 16825 (C2) HDA temperature 122 101 25 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	58.8% Above average	Read 108 Write 96.4 Mixed 98.1 76% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.28 94% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32 107,978 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 141GB free Firmware: JC47 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 161577879 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4289 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 82 60 181958325 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 12021 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3334 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 227 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 52 471138332 (C2) HDA temperature 28 48 42949672988 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 35 23 161577879 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 46 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 121470265087071 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2409792818 (F2) Unknown 100 253 644418875	55.2% Above average	Read 100 Write 91.9 Mixed 72.5 66% 88.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 1.52 4K Mixed 0.48 111% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-057.A00LF 99U5471-038.A00LF 16GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	52.2% Above average	MC Read 18.6 MC Write 17.5 MC Mixed 16.5 50% 17.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 17.7 48% 17 GB/s	Latency 64.5 62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61M-PRO Builds (Compare 220 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-PRO

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	30x
Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples	29x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	25x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	29x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	22x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	14x

SSD
120G 120GBHs-ssd-c100Bench 66%, 4,962 samples	17x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	5x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	3x

RAM
9905595-006.A00LF 2x2GBKingstonBench 43%, 63 samples	5x
99U5474-028.A00LF 8GBKingstonBench 47%, 39 samples	4x
SUPERTALENT02 6GBUnknownBench 35%, 49 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $59

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16