Asus G11CD-K

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	66.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus G11CD-K (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G11CD-K
Memory	20.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170608
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Apr 25 '20 at 23:03
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	74%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	61.3% Good	Memory 82.6 1-Core 93.6 2-Core 140 64% 105 Pts	4-Core 218 8-Core 330 34% 274 Pts	64-Core 334 21% 334 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Nvidia(10DE 120F) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 445.75 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	16.1% Very poor	Lighting 13.1 Reflection 30.2 Parallax 22.4 11% 21.9 fps	MRender 31.2 Gravity 35.5 Splatting 31.4 27% 32.7 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SB8U512G1002 512GB 2,367 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 226GB free (System drive) Firmware: X4131002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 221 249 248 236 240 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	66.5% Good	Read 353 Write 325 Mixed 233 SusWrite 242 65% 288 MB/s	4K Read 20.5 4K Write 39.8 4K Mixed 21.4 80% 27.2 MB/s	DQ Read 356 DQ Write 241 DQ Mixed 223 187% 273 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 103%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2TB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 183 182 190 201 186 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 186 Write 156 Mixed 80.5 SusWrite 187 111% 152 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CRC 2x16GB 1,772 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	52.3% Above average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 22.4 MC Mixed 15.4 53% 18.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.4 SC Write 16.9 SC Mixed 14.9 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 75.8 53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 94%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G11CD-K Builds (Compare 1,725 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

System: Asus G11CD-K

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	905x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	724x
Core i7-7700KIntel $242Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	30x

GPU
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	450x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	296x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	235x

SSD
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK256TBN 256GBBench 78%, 6,868 samples	145x
HFS128G32TND-N210A 128GBBench 63%, 4,377 samples	141x
SD8SBAT128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 58%, 3,654 samples	115x

RAM
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 39%, 21,551 samples	170x
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 74%, 20,415 samples	163x
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 22,600 samples	123x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $211

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16