Asus CG8250

Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 41% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	61.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	44.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Asus CG8250 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK CG8250
Memory	14.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120405
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 04 '17 at 08:20
Run Duration	178 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	77.8% Very good	Memory 83.5 1-Core 105 2-Core 215 76% 134 Pts	4-Core 397 8-Core 519 58% 458 Pts	64-Core 520 32% 520 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 77.8% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85AE) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 378.49 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	61.9% Good	Lighting 78 Reflection 78.9 Parallax 66.7 64% 74.5 fps	MRender 71 Gravity 71.8 Splatting 72.3 59% 71.7 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 750GB-$160 24,471 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 597GB free Firmware: M0C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 21 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 147 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 2 (AE) Unknown 100 100 40 (B7) Unknown 100 100 2 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 73 61 167504969755 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 14661 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 1672028949 (F7) Unknown 100 100 52235507 (F8) Unknown 100 100 20239883 (B4) Unknown 0 0 3576 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0
Poor: 67% Great: 104%
Crucial MX300 750GB-$160 24,471 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 597GB free Firmware: M0CR011 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 383 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 145 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 2 (AE) Unknown 100 100 39 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 99 99 1 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 68 58 180389871648 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 932 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 1961383225 (F7) Unknown 100 100 61304345 (F8) Unknown 100 100 18041592 (B4) Unknown 0 0 3536 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0
Poor: 67% Great: 104%
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40 53,931 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 138GB free (System drive) Firmware: X411 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1109 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 468 (A5) Unknown 100 100 51570934170 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 32 (A8) Unknown 100 100 19 (A9) Unknown 100 100 307 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 9 (AE) Unknown 100 100 59 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 70 42 180390002718 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 1172544684316 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 2276 (EA) Unknown 100 100 4208 (F1) Unknown 253 253 3878 (F2) Unknown 253 253 5509 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	44.9% Average	Read 262 Write 180 Mixed 178 46% 206 MB/s	4K Read 21 4K Write 25.4 4K Mixed 8.92 57% 18.4 MB/s	DQ Read 188 DQ Write 134 DQ Mixed 8.93 48% 110 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 101%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50 72,924 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 154GB free Firmware: 1AJ100E4 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 83 38 5269 (04) Start/Stop count 89 89 11642 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3355 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 252 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 322 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 4 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 57 184684773403 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 271 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 252 252 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 11679	60.2% Good	Read 102 Write 108 Mixed 99.4 78% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 2.39 4K Mixed 0.44 122% 1.18 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMX4GX3M1A1600C11 06C1 SLA302G08-GGNNG 029E CMX4GX3M1A1600C11 06C1 SLA302G08-GGNNG 16GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	49.9% Average	MC Read 17.8 MC Write 17.2 MC Mixed 15.4 48% 16.8 GB/s	SC Read 15.2 SC Write 17.9 SC Mixed 17.4 48% 16.8 GB/s	Latency 74.3 54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CG8250 Builds (Compare 135 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Asus CG8250

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	84x
Core i5-2320Intel $165Bench 64%, 38,345 samples	18x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	14x

GPU
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	17x
GeForce GT 530NvidiaBench 3%, 5,672 samples	16x
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	7x

SSD
Blue 250GBWD $90Bench 79%, 26,761 samples	9x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	8x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	6x

RAM
EL63I1C1624ZV 2x4GBAdataBench 48%, 365 samples	8x
Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GBCorsairBench 51%, 10,062 samples	5x
EL63I1C1624ZV EL63I1C1624ZV 16GBAdataBench 48%, 10 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 33% - Below average

Total price: $534

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16