Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20EQS19P00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive76.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 20EQS19P00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20EQS19P00
Memory4.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160803
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '20 at 17:26
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 106
2-Core 190
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 552
59% 471 Pts
64-Core 550
34% 550 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 70%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M1000M
Legend(17AA 222E) 2GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 377.55
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Lighting 17.3
Reflection 15
Parallax 15.9
14% 16.1 fps
MRender 21.8
Gravity 18.2
Splatting 15.7
15% 18.6 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 14%
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 222E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.8141
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
5.27% Terrible
Lighting 5.47
Reflection 7.5
Parallax 6.03
4% 6.33 fps
MRender 6.81
Gravity 5.37
Splatting 11.6
7% 7.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.27%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSFJ256GDNU A 256GB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JYLA1102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 224 363 250 215 171 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
76.8% Very good
Read 480
Write 376
Mixed 408
SusWrite 261
85% 381 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 55.7
4K Mixed 34.6
110% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 160
120% 162 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905624-022.A00G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 12.5
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 13.2
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback