Asus TUF B360M-E GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 90% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 76% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	177% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B360M-E GAMING (all builds)
Memory	9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190527
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	May 16 '20 at 16:10
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	49%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9600K-$155 321,194 User benchmarks, average bench 93% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	87.7% Excellent	Memory 80.7 1-Core 133 2-Core 256 86% 157 Pts	4-Core 522 8-Core 663 76% 593 Pts	64-Core 669 41% 669 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 87.7% Great: 103%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210 663,603 User benchmarks, average bench 115% Zotac(19DA 4509) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	102% Outstanding	Lighting 128 Reflection 114 Parallax 133 104% 125 fps	MRender 162 Gravity 107 Splatting 97.6 97% 122 fps
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 123%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate BarraCuda 510 SSD ZP250CM30001 250GB 932 User benchmarks, average bench 150% 193GB free (System drive) Firmware: STPSC014 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1111 828 362 360 364 366 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	177% Outstanding	Read 1,198 Write 1,226 Mixed 1,088 SusWrite 565 229% 1,019 MB/s	4K Read 35.1 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 46.8 169% 62.5 MB/s	DQ Read 827 DQ Write 1,098 DQ Mixed 828 663% 918 MB/s
Poor: 103% ↑ This bench: 177% Great: 203%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 187 185 191 195 187 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown IRH2666D464L19S/8G 2x8GB 630 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	68% Good	MC Read 29.6 MC Write 23.3 MC Mixed 20.9 70% 24.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.1 SC Write 20.5 SC Mixed 21.1 53% 18.6 GB/s	Latency 79.3 50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B360M-E GAMING Builds (Compare 1,108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 53%

Yacht

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 45%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360M-E GAMING

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	300x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	155x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	124x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	81x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	71x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	70x

SSD
BarraCuda 510 SSD ZP250CM30001 250GBSeagateBench 150%, 932 samples	38x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	34x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	30x

RAM
IRH2666D464L19S/8G 2x8GBUnknownBench 79%, 630 samples	85x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	58x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	47x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 113% - Outstanding

Total price: $218

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16