Asus STRIX Z270H GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics40.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive251% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270H GAMING  (all builds)
Memory29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 19 '20 at 23:34
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 96.9
1-Core 146
2-Core 293
99% 179 Pts
4-Core 574
8-Core 812
87% 693 Pts
64-Core 808
50% 808 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 102%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2102 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.7% Average
Lighting 46
Reflection 53.1
Parallax 43.1
38% 47.4 fps
MRender 65.7
Gravity 46
Splatting 60
47% 57.2 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4L7QCXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 499 325 325 325 326 325 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
251% Outstanding
Read 1,993
Write 1,171
Mixed 847
SusWrite 354
241% 1,091 MB/s
4K Read 63
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 86.2
299% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,462
DQ Write 1088
DQ Mixed 1,034
838% 1,195 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 251%
Great: 236%
Samsung MZ7LN512HMJP-000L7 512GB
158GB free
Firmware: MAV01L6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 327 297 287 269 269 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 496
Mixed 403
SusWrite 315
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 49.7
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 68.5
237% 86 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 362
272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 130%
Great: 132%
Samsung MZ7LN512HMJP-000L7 512GB
193GB free
Firmware: MAV01L6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 488 482 439 471 460 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 495
Mixed 406
SusWrite 465
106% 470 MB/s
4K Read 49.8
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 69.9
238% 85.6 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 361
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 139%
Great: 132%
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
55GB free
Firmware: 3L2QEXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,344
Write 1,835
Mixed 1,612
428% 1,930 MB/s
4K Read 69.6
4K Write 192
4K Mixed 95.8
330% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 1,548
DQ Write 1,398
DQ Mixed 1,434
1,086% 1,460 MB/s
Poor: 130% Great: 296%
SanDisk Cruzer 8GB
7GB free, PID 5530
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 4 4 4 4 3.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
8.51% Terrible
Read 16.5
Write 3.7
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 3.8
8% 7.38 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 2
131% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.51%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 38
MC Write 38.7
MC Mixed 31.6
103% 36.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 42.7
SC Mixed 30.6
88% 30.6 GB/s
Latency 50.7
79% 50.7 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 102%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270H GAMING Builds (Compare 3,209 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270H GAMING - $247

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $747
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback