Today's hottest deals

Samsung R528/R728/R538

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemSamsung R528/R728/R538  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG R528/R728/R538
Memory6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100621
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 21 '20 at 17:39
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium P6200
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
40.5% Average
Memory 63.6
1-Core 50.9
2-Core 107
45% 73.8 Pts
4-Core 103
8-Core 107
14% 105 Pts
64-Core 104
6% 104 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C06A) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2219
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.82% Terrible
Lighting 0.87
Reflection 1.15
Parallax 0.81
1% 0.94 fps
MRender 1.33
Gravity 0.63
Splatting 1.7
1% 1.22 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.82%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$34
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 45 3.5 92 6.8 79 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.9% Below average
Read 238
Write 127
Mixed 192
SusWrite 64.3
35% 156 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 26
4K Mixed 14.3
57% 18.9 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 167
DQ Mixed 50.1
68% 124 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown JM1333KSN-4G 075D GR1333S364L9/4G 8GB
667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.2% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 10
24% 8.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.4
18% 6.2 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical R528/R728/R538 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung R528/R728/R538

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $164
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback