Asus P5QL PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P5QL PRO  (all builds)
Memory1.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090701
Uptime8.2 Days
Run DateMay 22 '20 at 12:39
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 71%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
31.8% Below average
Memory 59.1
1-Core 3.8
2-Core 10.3
22% 24.4 Pts
4-Core 28
8-Core 51.3
5% 39.7 Pts
64-Core 52
3% 52 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GSO
Asus(1043 828D) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
3.42% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 5.04
Parallax 2.12
4% 3.89 fps
MRender 3.43
Gravity 4.73
Splatting 2.87
3% 3.68 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.42%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 14 6.5 14 57 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
23.5% Poor
Read 49.3
Write 55.2
Mixed 44.5
SusWrite 32.3
34% 45.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 54%
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30
172GB free
Firmware: 01.01S02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 98 100 99 99 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 106
Write 98.6
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 99.3
71% 95.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
215% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 59%
Great: 76%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 124GB
40GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.1 6.4 4.9 16 8.4 9.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
7.31% Terrible
Read 22.2
Write 5.3
Mixed 13
SusWrite 8.6
14% 12.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.7
52% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.31%
Great: 39%
SanDisk Ultra 248GB
195GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 9.5 6.6 9.6 16 15 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 31.3
Write 16.3
Mixed 21
SusWrite 11.1
25% 19.9 MB/s
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.3
117% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
1024, 2048, 1024, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
MC Read 5.2
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 3.8
12% 4.1 GB/s
SC Read 0.5
SC Write 2.1
SC Mixed 2.8
5% 1.8 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5QL PRO Builds (Compare 262 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5QL PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $209
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback