Asus H87-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Jet ski	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	52.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	24.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H87-PRO (all builds)
Memory	1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140303
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	May 23 '20 at 23:31
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	65%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790T 1,099 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	61.4% Good	Memory 79.7 1-Core 74.9 2-Core 140 59% 98.1 Pts	4-Core 238 8-Core 322 35% 280 Pts	64-Core 368 23% 368 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% MSI(1462 3283) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.66 Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	52.9% Above average	Lighting 65.5 Reflection 59.2 Parallax 58.6 53% 61.1 fps	MRender 65 Gravity 62 Splatting 63.7 52% 63.5 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 45GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1Z40102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 175 61 47 23 40 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	24.3% Poor	Read 331 Write 270 Mixed 7 SusWrite 88.5 38% 174 MB/s	4K Read 13 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.3 21% 5.1 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 100%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$42 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 43GB free Firmware: UF510000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 98 82 102 103 99 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	45.9% Average	Read 354 Write 266 Mixed 260 SusWrite 121 56% 250 MB/s	4K Read 16.9 4K Write 32.7 4K Mixed 16.6 64% 22.1 MB/s	DQ Read 118 DQ Write 93.3 DQ Mixed 43.9 50% 85.2 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	46.9% Average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 17.4 MC Mixed 15.7 48% 16.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 14.1 SC Mixed 10.7 33% 11.6 GB/s	Latency 81.1 49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87-PRO Builds (Compare 567 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87-PRO

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	136x
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	75x
Core i5-4570Intel $62Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	74x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	55x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	35x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	34x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	20x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	20x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	17x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	22x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	16x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $220

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16