Asus M51BC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics57.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus M51BC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M51BC
Memory13.5 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130805
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 24 '20 at 12:45
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4300-$73
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Memory 84.1
1-Core 65.2
2-Core 115
56% 88.1 Pts
4-Core 176
8-Core 194
24% 185 Pts
64-Core 195
12% 195 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Gigabyte(1458 3718) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Lighting 71.5
Reflection 73.8
Parallax 64.2
58% 69.8 fps
MRender 69.7
Gravity 67.2
Splatting 70.6
57% 69.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 242 251 257 256 256 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Read 462
Write 432
Mixed 348
SusWrite 251
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 66
4K Mixed 41.4
141% 47.4 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 182
155% 228 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 118%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
441GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 126 129 129 123 137 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Read 128
Write 148
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 127
79% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 107%
Seagate Portable 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 30 30 30 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Read 25.7
Write 26.5
Mixed 27.7
SusWrite 28.9
20% 27.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL25664TG1337.K16S Kingston ASU16D3LU1KBG/8G BL25664TG1337.K16S Kingston ASU16D3LU1KBG/8G 20GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 8192, 2048, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.9% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 15.5
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 12.7
28% 9.97 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M51BC Builds (Compare 118 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus M51BC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $298
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback