Asus H87-PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	33% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H87-PRO (all builds)
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20141028
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 02 '20 at 13:11
Run Duration	119 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4670-$52 49,019 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	81.7% Excellent	Memory 90.4 1-Core 113 2-Core 223 81% 142 Pts	4-Core 423 8-Core 425 57% 424 Pts	64-Core 419 26% 419 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 81.7% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Asus(1043 854D) CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 397.93 Performing below potential (65^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	33% Below average	Lighting 41 Reflection 45.2 Parallax 43.7 33% 43.3 fps	MRender 39.1 Gravity 41.1 Splatting 37.9 32% 39.4 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40 43,024 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 158GB free (System drive) Firmware: CR100-13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 37 37 39 36 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	24.3% Poor	Read 48.1 Write 56.4 Mixed 26.5 SusWrite 36.5 31% 41.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.8 132% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 44%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 43 51 41 58 39 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	53.8% Above average	Read 142 Write 43.1 Mixed 61.3 SusWrite 45.1 54% 72.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1.1 190% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR3 1333 C9 2x8GB 2,312 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	54.4% Above average	MC Read 18.8 MC Write 19.1 MC Mixed 17.3 53% 18.4 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 19.4 SC Mixed 18.2 51% 17.7 GB/s	Latency 66.7 60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87-PRO Builds (Compare 568 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87-PRO

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	136x
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	75x
Core i5-4570Intel $62Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	74x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	55x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	35x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	35x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	20x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	20x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	17x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	22x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	16x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $220

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16