Today's hottest deals

HP ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81F5
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191220
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 02 '20 at 15:41
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-7310 APU (2015 M.Ca)
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
29.5% Poor
Memory 37
1-Core 36.9
2-Core 73
29% 49 Pts
4-Core 129
8-Core 128
17% 128 Pts
64-Core 126
8% 126 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R4
HP(103C 81F5) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.5.1
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
2.31% Terrible
Lighting 2.73
Reflection 4.85
Parallax 3.72
2% 3.77 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 3.48
2% 2.96 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.31%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 149 126 49 65 32 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 399
Write 294
Mixed 283
SusWrite 87.2
59% 266 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 47.9
4K Mixed 28.8
104% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 131
98% 130 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-CK0 Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G9P1 8GB
1600, 1866 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.7% Very poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 6.3
17% 6.07 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 6.5
16% 5.53 GB/s
Latency 217
18% 217 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $161
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback