MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 76% Battleship	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 70% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C51
Motherboard	MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) (all builds)
Memory	18.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191108
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 02 '20 at 17:23
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$120 142,983 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	78.1% Very good	Memory 76.4 1-Core 120 2-Core 231 79% 143 Pts	4-Core 429 8-Core 691 69% 560 Pts	64-Core 934 58% 934 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250 254,908 User benchmarks, average bench 98% Gigabyte(1458 2313) Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.2 Performing below potential (72^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	100% Outstanding	Lighting 119 Reflection 98.5 Parallax 244 97% 154 fps	MRender 113 Gravity 123 Splatting 146 106% 127 fps
Poor: 91% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 104%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon CV8-8E128-HP 128GB 7,685 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: V881 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 505 Write 391 Mixed 395 96% 430 MB/s	4K Read 39.3 4K Write 88.3 4K Mixed 51 172% 59.5 MB/s	DQ Read 272 DQ Write 295 DQ Mixed 117 134% 228 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 95%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 67GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 98 98 98 98 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	71.5% Very good	Read 151 Write 121 Mixed 95.6 SusWrite 97.2 86% 116 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1.1 220% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 109%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9 66,405 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 0GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 94.6 Write 12.2 Mixed 17.7 37% 41.5 MB/s	4K Read 8.9 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 1.4 91% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX2400C15/8G CT16G4DFD8266.M16FJ 24GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 16384 MB Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	57% Above average	MC Read 21.4 MC Write 19.4 MC Mixed 17.5 56% 19.4 GB/s	SC Read 19.9 SC Write 22.2 SC Mixed 19.2 58% 20.4 GB/s	Latency 87.4 46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) Builds (Compare 3,843 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	533x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	478x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $82Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	384x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	311x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	227x
GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	222x

SSD
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	219x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	204x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	101x

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 1x16GBUnknownBench 43%, 3,974 samples	126x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	97x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	84x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $280

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16