Cisco UCSC-BSE-SFF-C200

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive40% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCisco UCSC-BSE-SFF-C200  (all builds)
MotherboardCisco UCSC-BSE-SFF-C200
Memory39.7 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 03 '20 at 10:54
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5649
CPU1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Memory 76.2
1-Core 39.9
2-Core 80.8
44% 65.6 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 361
34% 282 Pts
64-Core 483
30% 483 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 86%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lsilogic Logical Volume 4TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 328 316 352 345 323 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
40% Average
Read 329
Write 260
Mixed 102
SusWrite 334
57% 256 MB/s
4K Read 7.7
4K Write 8.4
4K Mixed 1.9
18% 6 MB/s
DQ Read 50.2
DQ Write 9.5
DQ Mixed 6.5
11% 22.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x8GB
6 of 12 slots used
48GB DIMM
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
38.5% Below average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 15.2
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 7.2
16% 5.67 GB/s
Latency 88
46% 88 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback