Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 58% Gunboat	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 59% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	62.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE (all builds)
Memory	26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 03 '20 at 17:18
Run Duration	173 Seconds
Run User	NAM-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	91.4% Outstanding	Memory 78.2 1-Core 154 2-Core 305 96% 179 Pts	4-Core 560 8-Core 985 93% 772 Pts	64-Core 1,429 88% 1,429 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 91.4% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 3739) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	62.8% Good	Lighting 79.1 Reflection 79.5 Parallax 68.3 64% 75.7 fps	MRender 71.3 Gravity 72.5 Splatting 73.6 60% 72.5 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 9317 Write 6,545 Mixed 7,484 1,728% 7782 MB/s	4K Read 576 4K Write 261 4K Mixed 296 1,390% 378 MB/s	DQ Read 1,646 DQ Write 1,236 DQ Mixed 1,328 1,023% 1,403 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$90 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 85GB free Firmware: 01.03A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 77 78 78 77 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	44.4% Average	Read 77.3 Write 76 Mixed 53.5 SusWrite 77.1 52% 71 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 58%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 471GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 99 100 100 99 99 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	56.8% Above average	Read 97.7 Write 98.5 Mixed 63 SusWrite 99.6 66% 89.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 184% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BL8G26C16U4B.8FD 4x8GB 177 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	77.9% Very good	MC Read 31.9 MC Write 20.1 MC Mixed 31.4 79% 27.8 GB/s	SC Read 22.3 SC Write 19.8 SC Mixed 31.4 70% 24.5 GB/s	Latency 83.9 48% 83.9 ns
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 77.9% Great: 99%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,751 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 159%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 161%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	2,137x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,716x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $153Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	1,260x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	913x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	880x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	698x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	599x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	431x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	398x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	303x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	299x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	275x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 83% - Excellent

Total price: $1,201

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16