Asus H87M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 8.1 is the second most recent version of Windows but it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H87M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150602
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 06 '20 at 21:54
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i3-4130-$200
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
67.7% Good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 83.2
2-Core 148
68% 108 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 246
34% 251 Pts
64-Core 250
17% 250 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$110
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Lighting 22
Reflection 16.8
Parallax 20
18% 19.6 fps
MRender 25.1
Gravity 22.4
Splatting 16.7
18% 21.4 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 20%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 512GB-$55
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0427ANR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 376 381 401 404 395 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 431
Write 370
Mixed 379
SusWrite 391
88% 393 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 78.7
4K Mixed 51.7
156% 54.1 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 283
231% 329 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 106%
Great: 124%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 31GB
27GB free
Firmware: PMAP
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 17 17 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Read 59.1
Write 52.1
Mixed 14.7
SusWrite 18
26% 36 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 2
514% 3 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 41%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 31GB
29GB free
Firmware: PMAP
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Write 27
SusWrite 17.7
16% 22.4 MB/s
4K Read 9.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
408% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 41%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$90
655GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 122 119 122 122 126 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 137
Write 94.3
Mixed 79.6
SusWrite 121
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 114%
Generic MassStorageClass 8GB
7GB free, PID 0745
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 4.6 4.9 4.4 5.1 5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
4.3% Terrible
Read 18
Write 2.7
Mixed 2.8
SusWrite 4.6
7% 7.03 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
11% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.3%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 0420 DDR3 1600 0420 DDR3 1600 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.4% Below average
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 9.4
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 10.7
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical H87M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,078 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87M-PLUS - $128

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $427
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $394Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback