| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 8.39% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 14.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 7GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 7GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (72%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus P5N-E SLI (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.9 GB free of 7 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20070611 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 10 '20 at 05:40 |
| Run Duration | 211 Seconds |
| Run User | CYP-User |
| Background CPU | 72% |
PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
31.6%
Below average
|
28% 38.1 Pts
|
5% 38.9 Pts
|
2% 35.9 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
Asus(1043 83C2) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
|
8.39%
Terrible
|
8% 8.42 fps
|
9% 10.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 506A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 17 34 37 59 60 MB/s
|
14.4%
Very poor
|
11% 47.9 MB/s
|
26% 8.73 MB/s
|
21% 26.2 MB/s
|
|
|
11.6%
Very poor
|
13% 55.7 MB/s
|
16% 5.73 MB/s
|
29% 43.9 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 7GB
null MHz
1024, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
10.4%
Very poor
|
9% 3.23 GB/s
|
6% 2 GB/s
|
29% 136 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5N-E SLI Builds (Compare 84 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5N-E SLI
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 19x |
| Core2 Duo E6750IntelBench 38%, 9,456 samples | 12x |
| Core2 Duo E8600Intel $180Bench 44%, 6,109 samples | 7x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce 8800 GTXNvidiaBench 6%, 1,377 samples | 7x |
| GTX 260Nvidia $250Bench 7%, 11,945 samples | 6x |
| GeForce 8800 GTNvidiaBench 6%, 5,568 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 35% - Below average | Total price: $195 |