Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 19% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	2.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	24.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-7000 APU (2014 M.Ka) 246 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Socket FS1r2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	15.5% Very poor	Memory 25.7 1-Core 24.6 2-Core 27.3 17% 25.9 Pts	4-Core 29.6 8-Core 56 5% 42.8 Pts	64-Core 51.2 3% 51.2 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.5% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R4 Graphics 430 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 5110) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.20 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	2.05% Terrible	Lighting 2.27 Reflection 3.88 Parallax 2.69 2% 2.95 fps	MRender 3.24 Gravity 1.7 Splatting 3.74 2% 2.89 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.05% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SQ500S37240G 240GB 1,214 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 192GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 142 150 161 225 183 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	24.5% Poor	Read 122 Write 90.4 Mixed 78.2 SusWrite 174 26% 116 MB/s	4K Read 7.9 4K Write 14.1 4K Mixed 6.3 28% 9.43 MB/s	DQ Read 16.9 DQ Write 17.4 DQ Mixed 14.7 12% 16.3 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 8GB 1,258 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	19% Very poor	MC Read 7.6 MC Write 4.8 MC Mixed 8.1 20% 6.83 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 3.8 SC Mixed 6.8 15% 5.27 GB/s	Latency 281 14% 281 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 19% Great: 56%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 29%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
A6-7000 APU (2014 M.Ka)AMDBench 26%, 246 samples	11x

GPU
Radeon R4 GraphicsAMDBench 2%, 430 samples	11x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	1x
LCT-256M3S 2.5 7mm 256GBLiteonitBench 76%, 2,208 samples	1x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	2x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	2x
9905428-427.A00LF 1x8GBKingstonBench 27%, 350 samples	1x

Value: 8% - Terrible

Total price: $38

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16