Packard ixtreme M5740

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.79% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	39.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Packard ixtreme M5740 (all builds)
Motherboard	Packard FMP55
Memory	3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20091215
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 12 '20 at 23:54
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$339 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	67.1% Good	Memory 92.6 1-Core 59.6 2-Core 117 58% 89.9 Pts	4-Core 228 8-Core 321 35% 275 Pts	64-Core 313 19% 313 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 240 58,337 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Sapphire(174B E263) ≥ 4GB CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.20 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	5.79% Terrible	Lighting 6.93 Reflection 8.08 Parallax 9.31 6% 8.11 fps	MRender 7.67 Gravity 6.1 Splatting 8.13 6% 7.3 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.79% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 121GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 180 162 153 152 148 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39.1% Below average	Read 158 Write 144 Mixed 150 SusWrite 165 35% 154 MB/s	4K Read 14.2 4K Write 25.4 4K Mixed 16.5 56% 18.7 MB/s	DQ Read 120 DQ Write 115 DQ Mixed 118 88% 118 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 124%
Samsung D3 Station 2TB 2,805 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1TB free, PID 6123 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 16 15 15 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	14% Very poor	Read 16.4 Write 16.1 Mixed 18 SusWrite 16 23% 16.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.5 107% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 80%
TOSHIBA STOR.E ALU 2S 999GB 51 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 704GB free, PID 0b19 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 16 15 15 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	10.8% Very poor	Read 19.7 Write 17.1 Mixed 17.7 SusWrite 16.1 24% 17.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 48%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 15,101 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 479GB free, PID a200 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 23 23 21 21 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	11% Very poor	Read 19.3 Write 17.1 Mixed 15.1 SusWrite 22.2 25% 18.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 55% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5673EH1-CH9 4x2GB 1,085 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	38.7% Below average	MC Read 14.3 MC Write 13 MC Mixed 12.2 38% 13.2 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 9 SC Mixed 9.6 26% 9.03 GB/s	Latency 62.9 64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ixtreme M5740 Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 15%

Tree trunk

System: Packard ixtreme M5740

CPU
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	30x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	12x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	5x
GeForce GT 230NvidiaBench 4%, 1,567 samples	4x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	4x

SSD
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TBBench 70%, 46,239 samples	5x
MX100 256GBCrucial $116Bench 83%, 55,768 samples	3x
PLUS 1000GBSandiskBench 44%, 44,528 samples	3x

RAM
M378B5673EH1-CH9 4x2GBSamsungBench 38%, 1,085 samples	3x
M378B5673EH1-CH9 M378B2873EH1-CH9 M378B5673EH1-CH9 M378B2873EH1-CH9 6GBSamsungBench 36%, 295 samples	3x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 29%, 7,230 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 45% - Average

Total price: $281

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16