Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3H

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Surfboard	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	25.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3H (all builds)
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121026
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 24 '20 at 02:10
Run Duration	175 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	81.9% Excellent	Memory 92.4 1-Core 81.1 2-Core 210 73% 128 Pts	4-Core 393 8-Core 516 58% 455 Pts	64-Core 516 32% 516 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 81.9% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 370-$153 39,178 User benchmarks, average bench 21% MSI(1462 2015) CLim: 1030 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.2 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	25.6% Poor	Lighting 30.9 Reflection 33.2 Parallax 36.8 25% 33.7 fps	MRender 29.5 Gravity 26.1 Splatting 38.8 26% 31.5 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 23%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 256GB 256GB 9,229 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 207GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1120A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 101 105 105 104 105 MB/s Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	40.9% Average	Read 222 Write 198 Mixed 193 SusWrite 104 40% 179 MB/s	4K Read 19.4 4K Write 44.6 4K Mixed 18.6 77% 27.5 MB/s	DQ Read 23.5 DQ Write 84 DQ Mixed 21.7 26% 43.1 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 166%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 11GB free Firmware: HP51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 102 106 105 105 106 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	65.7% Good	Read 124 Write 79.3 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 105 68% 92.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 157% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 112%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 16GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 93 100 101 102 101 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	60.5% Good	Read 112 Write 91.2 Mixed 27.3 SusWrite 99 60% 82.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 103%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59 47,815 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 48GB free Firmware: JP2OA3MA SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 106 121 121 118 111 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	52.3% Above average	Read 65.7 Write 72 Mixed 46.2 SusWrite 116 55% 75.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 74%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB 2,476 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 11GB free, PID 4100 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 4.1 3.5 3.8 4 4.1 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	4.8% Terrible	Read 15 Write 21.7 Mixed 1.8 SusWrite 3.8 14% 10.6 MB/s	4K Read 7.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 28% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.8% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF 99U5471-012.A00LF 9905471-017.A00LF 8000 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	50.2% Above average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 17.1 MC Mixed 15.3 48% 16.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 17.8 SC Mixed 16.9 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 63.3 63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B75M-D3H Builds (Compare 3,866 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3H - $80

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	870x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	596x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	355x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	375x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	252x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	182x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	172x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	98x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	87x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	52x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	45x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	37x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $405

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16