Panasonic CF-19RHRC8PE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6.01GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6.01GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPanasonic CF-19RHRC8PE  (all builds)
MotherboardPanasonic CF19-4
Memory4.6 GB free of 6.00781 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110411
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 04 '20 at 14:57
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 U 540
IC1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Memory 52.3
1-Core 48.9
2-Core 62.4
36% 54.5 Pts
4-Core 77.3
8-Core 76.2
10% 76.8 Pts
64-Core 77.5
5% 77.5 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Device(10F7 8338) 2.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.21% Terrible
Lighting 0.23
Reflection 0.31
Parallax 0.31
0% 0.28 fps
MRender 0.38
Gravity 0.1
Splatting 0.43
0% 0.31 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.21%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V Series SATA SSD 480GB
425GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H190117H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 202 199 197 200 197 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.9% Average
Read 207
Write 199
Mixed 202
SusWrite 199
46% 202 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 30.4
4K Mixed 21.2
66% 22.2 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 157
DQ Mixed 171
129% 172 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 46GB
800, 800, 0 MHz
2048, 4096, 40960 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16.9% Very poor
MC Read 5.1
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 7.2
16% 5.63 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 5.3
13% 4.7 GB/s
Latency 152
26% 152 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback