Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	27.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	224% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Gigabyte B450 AORUS PRO
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF (all builds)
Memory	5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190722
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 10 '20 at 15:51
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	SVN-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 3000G-$80 11,076 User benchmarks, average bench 53% AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	64.4% Good	Memory 70.7 1-Core 120 2-Core 202 74% 131 Pts	4-Core 336 8-Core 338 45% 337 Pts	64-Core 337 21% 337 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500 60,738 User benchmarks, average bench 22% Sapphire(1DA2 E348) 2GB CLim: 1386 MHz, MLim: 1700 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.10.16 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	27.1% Poor	Lighting 32.7 Reflection 33.8 Parallax 42 27% 36.1 fps	MRender 32.3 Gravity 33.3 Splatting 35.8 28% 33.8 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 27.1% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 80,540 User benchmarks, average bench 217% 264GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 797 643 626 634 511 583 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	224% Outstanding	Read 1,464 Write 1,146 Mixed 1082 SusWrite 632 242% 1,081 MB/s	4K Read 62.9 4K Write 136 4K Mixed 82.2 273% 93.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,038 DQ Write 863 DQ Mixed 946 710% 949 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 224% Great: 296%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB 1,938 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 28GB free, PID 5595 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 13 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	16.8% Very poor	Read 33.7 Write 17.7 Mixed 17.6 SusWrite 19.7 28% 22.2 MB/s	4K Read 6.2 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1.7 149% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 16.8% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial Ballistix Sport LT DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GB-$25 20,263 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	47.9% Average	MC Read 17.5 MC Write 16.7 MC Mixed 15.1 47% 16.4 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 17.5 SC Mixed 16.6 47% 16.6 GB/s	Latency 99.8 40% 99.8 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 4,473 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 80%

Battleship

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 75%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	885x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	631x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	461x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	285x
RTX 3060Nvidia $274Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	254x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	241x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	157x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	106x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	106x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	241x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	222x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	218x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $451

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16