Asus ROG STRIX B360-G GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 118%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics144% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B360-G GAMING  (all builds)
Memory20.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180620
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateJul 20 '20 at 05:04
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Memory 90.4
1-Core 134
2-Core 250
89% 158 Pts
4-Core 474
8-Core 819
78% 647 Pts
64-Core 1,056
65% 1,056 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 100%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
31% Below average
Lighting 38.2
Reflection 31.4
Parallax 37.2
31% 35.6 fps
MRender 37.5
Gravity 38.6
Splatting 36.9
31% 37.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31%
Great: 33%
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
EVGA(3842 2383) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
144% Outstanding
Lighting 196
Reflection 209
Parallax 218
159% 208 fps
MRender 243
Gravity 195
Splatting 121
145% 186 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 144%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
424GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 451 376 365 360 326 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 471
Mixed 414
SusWrite 389
100% 442 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 87.8
4K Mixed 53.3
175% 60.2 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 355
266% 354 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 114%
Great: 133%
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
30GB free
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 58 60 51 61 51 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 476
Write 155
Mixed 156
SusWrite 57.1
46% 211 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 47.7
4K Mixed 16.4
74% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 46.4
DQ Mixed 26
37% 71.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 78%
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB-$71
464GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 81 81 83 83 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 92.2
Write 41.1
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 81.4
46% 62.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
89% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 62%
WD easystore 25FA 4TB
1TB free, PID 25fa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 35 37 37 37 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
26.2% Poor
Read 33.4
Write 33.6
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 36.3
45% 32.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.9
181% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.2% Good
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 24.9
MC Mixed 21.2
67% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 23
63% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX B360-G GAMING Builds (Compare 2,226 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B360-G GAMING - $109

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $408
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback