Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H61-M PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130918
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 28 '20 at 08:51
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2100-$49
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.7% Good
Memory 92.7
1-Core 84.4
2-Core 141
66% 106 Pts
4-Core 215
8-Core 213
29% 214 Pts
64-Core 216
13% 216 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30% Poor
Lighting 25
Reflection 28.8
Parallax 77.2
20% 43.7 fps
MRender 64.3
Gravity 61.5
Splatting 54.5
49% 60.1 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 30%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ SOLID3 60GB
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.25
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 157
Write 64.4
Mixed 92.8
23% 105 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 45.2
4K Mixed 24.9
83% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 81.5
DQ Write 60.5
DQ Mixed 58.2
47% 66.7 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 50%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$46
384GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 102 102 102 102 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 99.9
Write 96.9
Mixed 67.9
SusWrite 101
67% 91.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
160% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Team--Elite-1333 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
54.1% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 16.8
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M PRO Builds (Compare 281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $183
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $360
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback