HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84DA
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200323
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 02 '20 at 19:58
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 96%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
31.1% Below average
Memory 44.5
1-Core 40.9
2-Core 72.9
32% 52.8 Pts
4-Core 96.5
8-Core 176
16% 136 Pts
64-Core 256
16% 256 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 86%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
HP(103C 84DA) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6345
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
3.38% Terrible
Lighting 3.13
Reflection 8.19
Parallax 5.59
3% 5.64 fps
MRender 3.95
Gravity 5.37
Splatting 8.04
5% 5.79 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.38%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
HP(103C 84DA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.48
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.74% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 4.88
Parallax 8.72
3% 5.9 fps
MRender 7.86
Gravity 3.93
Splatting 5.13
4% 5.64 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 3.74%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 412 333 321 308 298 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 1,036
Write 343
Mixed 374
SusWrite 343
115% 524 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 29.6
4K Mixed 7.6
36% 14.8 MB/s
DQ Read 329
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 329
228% 285 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 302%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
600GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3T0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 117 115 117 117 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 108
Write 105
Mixed 35.2
SusWrite 117
66% 91.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.4
101% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
58.5% Above average
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 21.9
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 11.3
28% 9.97 GB/s
Latency 182
22% 182 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc0xxx Builds (Compare 3,690 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback