| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 66.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 84% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock B365M Pro4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190515 |
| Uptime | 0.4 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 04 '20 at 03:15 |
| Run Duration | 125 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 22% |
PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
86.4%
Excellent
|
83% 147 Pts
|
65% 484 Pts
|
31% 497 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
66.1%
Good
|
68% 71.8 fps
|
62% 74.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
328GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 364 368 369 368 369 MB/s
|
84%
Excellent
|
83% 370 MB/s
|
94% 33.6 MB/s
|
206% 304 MB/s
|
|
Seagate ST3320311CS 320GB
297GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 88 87 89 89 89 MB/s
|
47.4%
Average
|
55% 74.6 MB/s
|
145% 1.03 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
45.4%
Average
|
44% 15.2 GB/s
|
40% 14 GB/s
|
59% 68.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical B365M Pro4 Builds (Compare 4,383 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock B365M Pro4
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 1,203x |
| Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples | 510x |
| Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 486x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 295x |
| RTX 3060Nvidia $274Bench 100%, 447,556 samples | 276x |
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 236x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $560 |