Sony SVE17125CVB

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	90.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Sony SVE17125CVB (all builds)
Motherboard	Sony VAIO
Memory	10 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120313
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Aug 04 '20 at 20:05
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	EGY-User
Background CPU	31%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3632QM 24,912 User benchmarks, average bench 61% N/A, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	56.7% Above average	Memory 76.6 1-Core 77.5 2-Core 132 58% 95.4 Pts	4-Core 205 8-Core 267 30% 236 Pts	64-Core 338 21% 338 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7500M 12,745 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Sony(104D 90AC) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0 Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	3.08% Terrible	Lighting 3.63 Reflection 3.58 Parallax 3.72 3% 3.64 fps	MRender 4.05 Gravity 3.43 Splatting 4.52 3% 4 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.08% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 142GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 349 325 303 310 305 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	90.3% Outstanding	Read 394 Write 389 Mixed 340 SusWrite 327 82% 362 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 61.3 4K Mixed 37.9 123% 42.2 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 356 270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 90.3% Great: 134%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 13GB free Firmware: AX001U SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 78 79 80 75 80 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	37.2% Below average	Read 50.7 Write 56.5 Mixed 25.2 SusWrite 78.7 38% 52.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 62%
Seagate BUP BK 4TB 13,353 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 2TB free Firmware: 0108 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 119 119 120 121 120 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	60.4% Good	Read 90.8 Write 106 Mixed 70.2 SusWrite 119 71% 96.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 0.6 167% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 65%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$16 13,359 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 24GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 16 18 16 15 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	10.7% Very poor	Read 25.8 Write 9.7 Mixed 7.3 SusWrite 15.5 17% 14.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.8 71% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5428-100.A00LF 99U5428-078.A00LF 16GB 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	49.2% Average	MC Read 19.2 MC Write 17.3 MC Mixed 16 50% 17.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 13 SC Mixed 13.4 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 87.1 46% 87.1 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Sony SVE17125CVB

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)