PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 28.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 71.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-890FXA-UD5 (all builds) |
Memory | 4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20101124 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Aug 06 '20 at 22:41 |
Run Duration | 206 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
65.4%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD HD 7950-$290
Sapphire(174B 3000) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.9%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 95 66 86 100 96 MB/s
|
71.5%
Very good
|
|||
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
24GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 96 67 87 101 97 MB/s
|
46.3%
Average
|
|||
68%
Good
|
||||
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
19GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 82 86 82 58 77 MB/s
|
46%
Average
|
|||
36.1%
Below average
|
||||
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
32GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 52 49 47 40 29 MB/s
|
40.1%
Average
|
|||
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
27GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 51 49 47 40 29 MB/s
|
35.5%
Below average
|
|||
WDC WD20 EFRX-68EUZN0 2TB
84GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 34 35 35 35 34 MB/s
|
19.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
|
37.2%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples | 42x |
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples | 15x |
Phenom II X6 1100TAMD $340Bench 59%, 12,769 samples | 13x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 13x |
HD 6950AMD $290Bench 19%, 24,657 samples | 6x |
R9 390AMD $325Bench 50%, 82,117 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 66% - Good | Total price: $473 |