Asrock FM2A75 Pro4-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics16.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A75 Pro4-M  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display3840x2160x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 22 '20 at 13:39
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 750K-$45
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
56.1% Above average
Memory 82
1-Core 66
2-Core 113
55% 87.1 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 173
24% 176 Pts
64-Core 179
11% 179 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 3767) 2GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Lighting 20.9
Reflection 16.7
Parallax 21.8
17% 19.8 fps
MRender 16.2
Gravity 20.6
Splatting 22.3
16% 19.7 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingmax 120GB 120GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 339
Write 308
Mixed 274
68% 307 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 62.8
4K Mixed 20
101% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 35.3
62% 119 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 86%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$37
137GB free
Firmware: 17.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,115
Write 27.6
Mixed 49.7
524% 731 MB/s
4K Read 209
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.7
8,913% 70.6 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 70%
Seagate ST380815AS 80GB-$35
11GB free
Firmware: 4.AD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 46 45 44 45 44 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Read 63.8
Write 62.9
Mixed 38.7
SusWrite 44.9
39% 52.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 42%
SanDisk Cruzer Spark 64GB
57GB free, PID 55a1
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 8.9 10 11 9.6 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 25.8
Write 10.5
Mixed 10.1
SusWrite 9.7
16% 14 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 2.7
185% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 14%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 257 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33% Below average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 11
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 10.3
25% 8.67 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 33%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A75 Pro4-M Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A75 Pro4-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $148
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback