Dell Studio 1735

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	29.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Dell Studio 1735 (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell 0H275K
Memory	1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20080801
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 25 '20 at 15:19
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	52%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T7500-$90 4,281 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	38.7% Below average	Memory 69.9 1-Core 16.8 2-Core 48 32% 44.9 Pts	4-Core 47.4 8-Core 47.8 6% 47.6 Pts	64-Core 48.3 3% 48.3 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650 3,003 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Dell(1028 0256) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.03% Terrible	Lighting 1.07 Reflection 2.54 Parallax 0.5 1% 1.37 fps	MRender 1.57 Gravity 0.47 Splatting 2.57 1% 1.53 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.03% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intenso SATAIII 120GB 464 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 76GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0222A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 94 100 105 53 29 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	29.8% Poor	Read 114 Write 77.3 Mixed 89.1 SusWrite 77.4 20% 89.5 MB/s	4K Read 13.2 4K Write 25.1 4K Mixed 14.9 52% 17.7 MB/s	DQ Read 94.8 DQ Write 97.1 DQ Mixed 1.2 27% 64.4 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 90%
WD Blue 2.5" 250GB (2009)-$30 16,754 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 227GB free Firmware: 11.01A11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 58 62 62 63 63 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	35.1% Below average	Read 62.2 Write 59.5 Mixed 36.2 SusWrite 59.7 40% 54.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 41%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 32GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 7GB free, PID cb40 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 6.5 7.1 7.4 7.2 7.5 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	4.93% Terrible	Read 17.1 Write 3.2 Mixed 7.7 SusWrite 6.8 10% 8.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 15% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.93% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	13.9% Very poor	MC Read 5.4 MC Write 3.4 MC Mixed 3.5 12% 4.1 GB/s	SC Read 3.7 SC Write 2.9 SC Mixed 3.9 10% 3.5 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Studio 1735 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 37%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Dell Studio 1735

CPU
Core2 Duo T8300Intel $27Bench 37%, 2,604 samples	9x
Core2 Duo T8100Intel $78Bench 35%, 2,639 samples	5x
Core2 Duo T5800IntelBench 34%, 3,175 samples	3x

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 3650ATIBench 2%, 3,003 samples	23x
Intel 965 Express Chipset FamilyMobileBench 0%, 3,066 samples	2x

SSD
SM841 2.5" 7mm 128GBSamsungBench 78%, 4,859 samples	6x
2TB 2TBSSDBench 82%, 311 samples	2x
IT LCS-128L9S-HP 128GBLiteonBench 81%, 2,338 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	18x
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	5x
2x1GBUnknownBench 14%, 68,489 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Good

Total price: $27

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16