Alienware Aurora-R3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics37.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAlienware Aurora-R3  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 046MHW
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110525
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 31 '20 at 19:55
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 65%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
62.4% Good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 84.5
2-Core 156
64% 108 Pts
4-Core 235
8-Core 294
34% 265 Pts
64-Core 292
18% 292 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Nvidia(10DE 116F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Lighting 49.1
Reflection 46.7
Parallax 41.3
40% 45.7 fps
MRender 39.4
Gravity 41.5
Splatting 38.4
32% 39.8 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
267GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 220 191 6.2 6.5 5.4 MB/s
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.5% Above average
Read 251
Write 226
Mixed 225
SusWrite 95.7
45% 199 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 56.1
4K Mixed 21.9
92% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 32.9
65% 130 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 92%
Seagate ST3160215SCE 160GB-$20
90GB free
Firmware: 3.AMC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 71 71 72 72 71 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 63.8
Write 62.4
Mixed 37.8
SusWrite 70.2
43% 58.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 42%
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$46
149GB free
Firmware: 3.CHF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 70 72 73 73 73 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 72.7
Write 39.4
Mixed 39.7
SusWrite 71.8
41% 55.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 42%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
311GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 73 73 74 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 70.9
Write 69.4
Mixed 39.3
SusWrite 72.4
46% 63 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 57%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
466GB free
Firmware: CR100-13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 81 83 83 83 83 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 83.2
Write 88.9
Mixed 48.7
SusWrite 82.3
56% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 44%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$50
332GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 102 104 104 104 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 77
Write 66.5
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 102
56% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173DB0 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
49.5% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 16.9
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 11.8
36% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora-R3 Builds (Compare 331 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Alienware Aurora-R3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $603
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback