Asus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics42.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive254% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190606
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 02 '20 at 04:08
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$252
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Memory 84.9
1-Core 117
2-Core 227
80% 143 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 742
70% 581 Pts
64-Core 759
47% 759 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$394
Asus(1043 8660) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.1% Average
Lighting 47.5
Reflection 54.9
Parallax 44.6
39% 49 fps
MRender 68
Gravity 47.6
Splatting 62.1
49% 59.3 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
741GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1102 1187 1175 1247 1264 1261 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
254% Outstanding
Read 2064
Write 1,744
Mixed 1350
SusWrite 1206
356% 1,591 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 63.2
194% 68.7 MB/s
DQ Read 893
DQ Write 733
DQ Mixed 765
586% 797 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 254%
Great: 372%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
322GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 423 460 462 473 475 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 472
Write 455
Mixed 368
SusWrite 454
98% 437 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 81.2
4K Mixed 49.4
164% 56.3 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 350
264% 353 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 114%
Great: 134%
PNY CS1311 120GB-$63
13GB free
Firmware: CS131122
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 432
Write 454
Mixed 341
91% 409 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 72.9
4K Mixed 31.7
121% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 320
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 176
173% 274 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 128 127 131 128 131 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 102
Write 107
Mixed 64
SusWrite 129
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1TB-$580
522GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 119 116 119 119 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 115
Write 116
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 118
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3600C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
61.3% Good
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 19.9
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 17.5
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING Builds (Compare 15,577 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 139%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING - $369

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $1,271
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $37
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback