Asus PRIME H310M-K R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	55.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	30.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (83%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME H310M-K R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190313
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 02 '20 at 09:57
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	83%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	59.7% Above average	Memory 85.3 1-Core 83.8 2-Core 184 68% 118 Pts	4-Core 189 8-Core 256 28% 223 Pts	64-Core 332 21% 332 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85AB) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 452.06 Performing below potential (44^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	55.3% Above average	Lighting 69.4 Reflection 70.3 Parallax 60.7 56% 66.8 fps	MRender 65.6 Gravity 62.8 Splatting 64.8 53% 64.4 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: V8X01c87 SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 15 31 10 30 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	30.1% Below average	Read 352 Write 39.7 Mixed 63.7 SusWrite 23.7 26% 120 MB/s	4K Read 6.8 4K Write 23.8 4K Mixed 10.5 36% 13.7 MB/s	DQ Read 121 DQ Write 25.7 DQ Mixed 15.7 26% 54.2 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 32GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 99 114 111 114 106 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	54.9% Above average	Read 86.2 Write 106 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 105 66% 89.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x8GB 9,275 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	51.5% Above average	MC Read 18.6 MC Write 16.2 MC Mixed 19.8 52% 18.2 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 13.9 SC Mixed 14.9 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 71.8 56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME H310M-K R2.0 Builds (Compare 7,067 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-K R2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	3,192x
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	1,498x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	460x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	721x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	560x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	509x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	435x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $42Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	306x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	294x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	206x
2x8GBAdataBench 77%, 24,552 samples	162x
1x8GBAdataBench 41%, 25,310 samples	138x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $359

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16