AZOM EXIGO

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 30% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	33.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	AZOM EXIGO (all builds)
Motherboard	AZOM EXIGO powered by premamod.com
Memory	10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161201
Uptime	7.4 Days
Run Date	Sep 05 '20 at 08:36
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	85.8% Excellent	Memory 91.1 1-Core 119 2-Core 206 81% 139 Pts	4-Core 434 8-Core 646 67% 540 Pts	64-Core 641 40% 641 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 85.8% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970M 21,995 User benchmarks, average bench 31% Clevo(1558 7502) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1038 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.08 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	33.5% Below average	Lighting 41.8 Reflection 41.8 Parallax 37.8 34% 40.5 fps	MRender 42.9 Gravity 40 Splatting 36.9 32% 40 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB 26,055 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 122GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT23B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 337 332 333 332 328 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 452 Write 418 Mixed 393 SusWrite 335 90% 400 MB/s	4K Read 38.2 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 33.9 160% 60.9 MB/s	DQ Read 360 DQ Write 305 DQ Mixed 245 207% 303 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 126%
Kingston SM2280S3 SATA M.2 120GB-$128 1,644 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 92GB free Firmware: S8FM06.A SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 322 319 322 313 321 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	68.6% Good	Read 453 Write 326 Mixed 231 SusWrite 319 74% 332 MB/s	4K Read 17.9 4K Write 61.1 4K Mixed 13.5 77% 30.8 MB/s	DQ Read 168 DQ Write 216 DQ Mixed 64.7 84% 149 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 68.6% Great: 82%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$22 80,932 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 16GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 54 72 81 75 69 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	42.4% Average	Read 79.8 Write 82.5 Mixed 49.3 SusWrite 67.5 51% 69.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GB 20,956 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	75.8% Very good	MC Read 27.4 MC Write 29 MC Mixed 23.7 76% 26.7 GB/s	SC Read 17.2 SC Write 28 SC Mixed 24.5 66% 23.2 GB/s	Latency 65.6 61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EXIGO Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 25%

Surfboard

System: AZOM EXIGO

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 970MNvidiaBench 31%, 21,995 samples	1x

SSD
860 EVO M.2 250GBSamsungBench 100%, 26,055 samples	1x

RAM
M471A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 20,956 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $180

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16