Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 45% Yacht	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 35% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	59.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Gigabyte A320M-S2H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF (all builds)
Memory	3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180808
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 09 '20 at 16:35
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104 181,631 User benchmarks, average bench 60% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	72.2% Very good	Memory 71.5 1-Core 104 2-Core 208 71% 128 Pts	4-Core 434 8-Core 353 54% 393 Pts	64-Core 351 22% 351 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 72%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	59.7% Above average	Lighting 74.4 Reflection 75.2 Parallax 61.8 61% 70.5 fps	MRender 69.8 Gravity 66.6 Splatting 73.7 58% 70 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 60%
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU) 85,536 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.10.16 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	12.4% Very poor	Lighting 14.9 Reflection 71.5 Parallax 19 12% 35.1 fps	MRender 12.4 Gravity 14.8 Splatting 18.5 13% 15.2 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 760GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 70 88 153 155 148 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	69.9% Good	Read 128 Write 140 Mixed 90.7 SusWrite 116 87% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 112%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB 11,405 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 25 Mixed 10 16% 17.5 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 15% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 2x4GB 1,330 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	77.9% Very good	MC Read 28.9 MC Write 28.2 MC Mixed 28.2 81% 28.4 GB/s	SC Read 19.5 SC Write 28.1 SC Mixed 20.3 65% 22.6 GB/s	Latency 98 41% 98 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 77.9% Great: 78%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,634 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	816x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	783x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	742x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	772x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	447x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	413x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	346x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	183x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	169x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	258x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	194x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	144x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $428

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16