Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	26.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (81%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	9.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	800 x 600 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 15 '20 at 20:11
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	81%

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5645 1,565 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.45 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	50.3% Above average	Memory 73.1 1-Core 42 2-Core 72.3 42% 62.5 Pts	4-Core 150 8-Core 264 25% 207 Pts	64-Core 314 20% 314 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 80%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 215GB 96 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 159GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 63 0.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	26.5% Poor	Read 496 Write 499 Mixed 251 SusWrite 49.5 72% 324 MB/s	4K Read 5.8 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 2.3 12% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 64%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x12GB 4,175 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 1 of 1 slots used 12GB DIMM RAM Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	35.2% Below average	MC Read 14.5 MC Write 12 MC Mixed 12.4 37% 13 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 7 17% 5.97 GB/s	Latency 94.3 42% 94.3 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 119%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	20x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16