User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics6.44% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP
MotherboardHP 8374
Memory7.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180329
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateSep 17 '20 at 03:10
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A12-9730P APU (2016 M.BR)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
26.2% Poor
Memory 34.4
1-Core 40.4
2-Core 98.6
32% 57.8 Pts
4-Core 105
8-Core 103
14% 104 Pts
64-Core 115
7% 115 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
HP(103C 8374) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
6.44% Terrible
Lighting 8
Reflection 10.9
Parallax 10.3
6% 9.73 fps
MRender 6.52
Gravity 7.67
Splatting 8.48
6% 7.56 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.44%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
834GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 124 140 137 144 152 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 158
Write 162
Mixed 90.6
SusWrite 134
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
200% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244BB0-CRC M471A1K43CB1-CRC 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
18.8% Very poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 6.4
19% 6.77 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 6
13% 4.7 GB/s
Latency 230
17% 230 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback